|
If you turn to the first page listed, you should find a
short description of this process and the major concerns of its critics.
Question 2 Describe two of these concerns |
This encyclopedia was written in 1978.. Let's try searching Medline
for more recent information. Remember that Medline is the source where
results from randomized trials and studies, and other research projects
in the medical world are reported.
Search for the terms: Glance through some of the articles on your result screen and read the
abstracts by clicking on the author's names. Notice that a few of the listings
tell you that no abstract is available.
|
Now let's use the Online
Encyclopedia Britannica. Try searching for information on irradiation.
Type the search term into the blank rectangle on the search screen and click on the SEARCH button. |
|
Your search should result in a list of articles that mention
your term. Look in one of the middle columns entitled, Encyclopedia
Britannica. There is no main entry for our specific term, but if you
click on the link, Negative Effects you will find a discussion of
both positive and negative effects of irradiation within the main entry
for Food Preservation.
Question 4 List an example of both of these: |
|
To cite this article in APA format, use the following example
as a guideline, where the main entry for the article was Meat Processing:
Meat Processing. (2000). _Encyclopedia Britannica_. Retrieved March
21, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://search.ebnet.com
|
Let's look now at Bioengineered Foods and the different
opinions about them. Below are 3 different sites.
Question 6 Look at each one of them and analyze them. Remember our list of questions to ask about websites? (Who wrote it, are there references given, who is the supporting institution, is there an inherent bias, and how recent is the information) See if you can find answers to these questions for each of the three sites:
|
The online version of the journal New Scientist has put together a website of links to articles about genetically modified crops. | |
Look at a few of these articles by clicking on their titles.
For most of them, you won't be able to pull up the entire article, but
you will get a detailed summary. Try to get a feel for the bias from New
Scientist.
Question 7 Would you say they are basically for, against or completely unbiased toward genetic engineering of crops? |
|
Question 8
Which articles did you scan that made you believe this? Give the titles and dates and how they led to your conclusion. |
NOAH is another popular site that prides itself on diseminating unbiased
medical information both in Spanish and English. It is a joint project
among the City University of New York, The Metropolitan New York Library
Council, The New York Academy of Medicine and The New York Public Library.
And they have some documents concerning food biotechnology and irradiation. Follow the link to Food Biotechnology/Irradiation/Safety and you should find at least 7 articles. If you run your cursor over the links to these 3 articles, you'll see the URLs displayed at the bottom of your screen. Two of the articles are posted by the same organization, www.eatright.org. Find the homepage for this organization (remember how to delete the endings of a URL?). Question 9
|
The American Dietetic Association has published a position paper on
Biotechnology
& the Future of Food. Look at this page:
Question 10
|
The Organic Consumers Organization
is a well-known non-profit organization that campaigns for food safety,
organic agriculture, fair trade & sustainability.
Here's a news article that will give you the flavor of their point of view.
|
And finally, just for fun, click here for a website that has been described by some critics as "the best Genetic Engineering site on the web." |
Congratulations!
This is your final internet assignment for Applied Nutrition.
https://barry-b.tripod.com/assignment5.html For questions or comments,please send e-mail to Barry Brazier at barry_bw@yahoo.com |